Have a look see:
Filed under: Uncategorized
December 12, 2009 • 3:05 am 0
I take special interest in this story because it involves my undergrad school, UC San Diego, and because I think someone in advertising will eventually tweet about it. Accompanying the tweet is likely a line about “breaking through the clutter.”
Background
I’ll quote the original article to save us both the pain of a summary.
A report published Wednesday by the University of California, San Diego, calculates that American households collectively consumed 3.6 zettabytes of information in 2008..FULL NYT ARTICLE HERE
What kind of information?
The study measures bytes and words but does not differentiate between which bytes and which words. It converts everything to bytes and aggregates them to arrive at 34 gigs of information. But what kind of information? Under its measurement, “I have a dream” and “I can haz cheezeburger?” are counted as equal information. I think this report, much like the information it measures, is superficial and I don’t think we can draw any conclusions from it yet.
At 66 kilobytes, this cartoon is smaller than my blog post. Yet it contains more information about what I think of the study. This discrepancy is why I think bytes are poor measures of information.
Tuan is a Copywriting Grad Student at the Academy of Art School of Advertising, follow @copytuan
Filed under: Arts & Culture, Ideas, Industry news
December 10, 2009 • 6:50 pm 0
Here’s a brand to consider: the entire country of China. It’s a brand that’s been struggling with image problems for decades, and has a target demographic that consists of just about everyone in the world. In this instance, the problem at hand is the fact that people only see China as a manufacturer of cheap goods, not ideas. Does advertising work when re-branding an entire nation? For outside countries to see China differently, China must actively change before our eyes. Real change; socially, economically, diplomatically, all of the above. And this is all in and itself advertising.
A good example of this is the 2008 Beijing Olympics. From the construction of the sporting facilities up to the dazzling opening ceremony, China seized the opportunity to position itself as a global force to be reckoned with. Sure, being in the spotlight brought out a lot of demons, namely China’s human rights issues, but sometimes the bad comes with the good. The Beijing Olympics was a product, PR event, marketing, and TV spot all rolled into one. It was part of a campaign to slowly re-brand an entire nation.
Yet, in the realm of world brands, another country is dealing with image problems: the United States of America. Once the team captain of the entire world, America has issues with its uncertain economy, foreign policy, among other hot topics. The Obama administration is trying to restore faith in a name that’s been tarnished by the previous administration. It’s a huge branding problem that could be remedied with this unique selling proposition: American ingenuity. Innovation has always put American products at the top of their respectable markets. In this ailing economy, we must believe that this is a time for big ideas. Unfortunately, we don’t. But let’s stay positive, and change this brand one innovation at a time.
Derek is a Copywriting Student at the Academy of Art University School of Advertising.
Filed under: Uncategorized
December 8, 2009 • 1:23 pm 0
Good day.
I wanted to share a video that a friend of mine sent to me after a conversation we had about the differences between European and American advertisements. The video below is for the American Company Wrangler and was made by the French firm Fred & Farid. They believe in ads as cultural endeavors. I read an article by the founders Frédéric Raillard & Farid Mokart, click here to read at your leisure:
While reading, I was intrigued by how balanced their perspective was on the differences between advertising in the world of the United States and that of, as they like to call it, the United States of Europe. America’s goal they say is “to write great new classical ads.” Whereas the United States of Europe seeks “to find great new genres of ads, a brand posture never explored before.” View the ad and see if you can identify the natural European smoothness that I felt when I viewed it.
Title: Stop thinking
Agency : FRED & FARID, PARIS
Brand: Wrangler Director: Yannis Rachid
Chief Creative Officer: Fred/Farid
Executive Creative Director: Fred/Farid
In Europe, ad land is playful and its boundaries are open whereas America’s rule-following background halts it from reaching its true creative Mecca. However, both have great strengths and achievements on their resume. If you mixed the two, you would have the perfect blend of
American dedication and European vigor thus creating new planets of possibilities. Why not shake hands on it. Put it there Europe.
Yvannia is a Senior Student Planner at the Academy of Art School of Advertising. Follow Fun @inFiveWords
Filed under: Advertising & Branding, Arts & Culture
December 5, 2009 • 1:43 pm 0
November 24, 2009 • 12:45 am 0
Newsstands were once our browser bookmark bars. Shelves were lined with magazines separated by category. Cooking. Fashion. Current Events. Remember those days? As a kid, I would wait by the magazine rack and flip through the likes of Sports Illustrated and Disney Adventures as my mom stood in line at the supermarket. Each turn of the page would reveal something new and exciting. The essence of an issue was presented to us from cover to cover. We didn’t need to click back to the homepage.
Unfortunately, the magazine business is suffering since the Internet has become our new feeder of information. Last year, magazine sales have dropped 6.3% with declining ad revenue as one of the leading causes (USA Today). While magazines have been on a steady decline, newspapers have suffered even more. The question is: does print stand a chance in this age, as the Internet is blowing out the candles for Web 3.0?
As the old saying goes, if you can’t beat em, join em. Case in point: Vanish, the cover story of the latest issue of Wired that follows writer Evan Ratliff as he attempts to leave behind his identity and disappear. The twist is that Wired has asked its readers to find him.
What began as a typical news story turned into a full-fledged interactive reader experience. Equal parts journalism, investigation, and social experiment, Vanish breaks the fourth wall by allowing the readers to help write the story.
As Ratliff desperately tries to lose his trail, Wired readers respond to this huge call-to-action. Just like that, the internet community starts foraging Ratliff’s Internet footprint and discussing ways to find him. Thousands of Tweets and Facebook status updates are posted in a matter of days. The Wired inbox gets filled to the brim with leads and questions. Real time private investigators get involved. I take no part in this, but the culmination of this cat-and-mouse game appears in glorious CMYK on glossy pages in the magazine sitting right in front of me.
Because of this story, I have a new appreciation for print. Sure, the same text is available on Wired.com, but what was once a time-stamped story in a periodical now becomes a living, breathing entity unrestricted by 8.5 inches by 11 inches. A story can thrive in the corners of Internet forums, on the Facebook walls of your friends, or at the blink of a camera phone.
For print media to survive, it must re-invent itself and make journalism a dynamic experience for its audience. Things are happening right now. Information travels fast. People respond faster. Publications like Wired, Newsweek, and the NY Times are leading the way. Let’s hope the rest of the pack catches up.
Derek is a Copywriting Student at the Academy of Art University School of Advertising.
Filed under: Arts & Culture, Nostalgia, Print, Viral